top of page

FREE TO DOWNLOAD Guidelines for assistive technology service provision – A scoping review (2024)

Peer reviewed article: Layton, N.; Spann, A.; Khan, M.; Contepomi, S.; Hoogerwerf, E.J.; Bell, D.; de Witte, L. Guidelines for assistive technology service provision – A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-12, doi:10.1080/17483107.2024.2327515.



Abstract: Purpose: Despite the high unmet need for effective AT provision, multiple service delivery models across different countries, and a shortage of personnel trained in this field, no widely useable and accepted Assistive Technology (AT) service provision guidelines currently exist. This review aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding AT service provision guidelines to inform the development of globally useable AT provision guidance, aligned with contemporary global initiatives to improve access to AT. Materials and Methods: The rapid scoping review method used a two-tiered approach to identifying relevant publications: (1) systematic search of academic databases (Medline, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar); (2) consultation with international AT organisations and experts. The search was conducted in March 2023 with no date limitations. Analysis was guided by the TIDE-funded HEART research on quality AT provision and service delivery processes in Europe, as well as the WHO-GATE 5 P framework for strengthening access to AT. Results: 35 publications were identified from various countries, and directed at differing assistive products, personnel, and provision contexts. No established guidelines for AT service provision currently exist. However, despite the variety in contexts, the range of assistive products and the range of stakeholders to whom guidelines are directed, several key service delivery steps were identified that may form part of such guidelines. Conclusions: This review offers a strong starting point for developing guidance for AT provision to meet global needs. Careful consideration of vocabulary, process, and application to the diversity of assistive products is recommended in systematizing globally applicable guidance.


Implications For Rehabilitation Guidelines offer accepted benchmarks for clinical practice. • Evidence-based guidelines ensure consistent and appropriate interventions, technology provision.

• The evidence suggests global guidance is required, and a substantial evidence base can be drawn upon to formulate such guidelines.









Comments


bottom of page